按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
entirely in the spirit of Plato （compare Protag； Ion； Apol。）。 The
characters are ill… drawn。 Socrates assumes the 'superior person' and
preaches too much； while Alcibiades is stupid and heavy…in…hand。 There
are traces of Stoic influence in the general tone and phraseology of the
Dialogue （compare opos melesei tis。。。kaka： oti pas aphron mainetai）：
and the writer seems to have been acquainted with the 'Laws' of Plato
21
… Page 22…
ERYXIAS
（compare Laws）。 An incident from the Symposium is rather clumsily
introduced； and two somewhat hackneyed quotations （Symp。； Gorg。） recur。
The reference to the death of Archelaus as having occurred 'quite lately' is
only a fiction； probably suggested by the Gorgias； where the story of
Archelaus is told； and a similar phrase occurs；ta gar echthes kai proen
gegonota tauta； k。t。l。 There are several passages which are either corrupt
or extremely ill… expressed。 But there is a modern interest in the subject
of the dialogue； and it is a good example of a short spurious work； which
may be attributed to the second or third century before Christ。
22