按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
which always strikes foreigners with amazement。
‘‘Nothing is more obvious； nothing is more certain；'' writes Mr。
Barret…Wendell； in his book on France； ‘‘than this fact： that not
only have the royalists； revolutionaries； and Bonapartists
always been mortally opposed to one another； but that； owing to
the passionate ardour of the French character； they have always
entertained a profound intellectual horror for one another。 Men
who believe themselves in possession of the truth cannot refrain
from affirming that those who do not think with them are
instruments of error。
‘‘Each party will gravely inform you that the advocates of the
adverse cause are afflicted by a dense stupidity or are
consciously dishonest。 Yet when you meet these latter； who will
say exactly the same things as their detractors； you cannot but
recognise； in all good faith； that they are neither stupid nor
dishonest。''
This reciprocal execration of the believers of each party has
always facilitated the overthrow of Governments and ministers in
France。 The parties in the minority will never refuse to ally
themselves against the triumphant party。 We know that a great
number of revolutionary Socialists have been elected to the
present Chamber only by the aid of the monarchists； who are still
as unintelligent as they were at the time of the Revolution。
Our religious and political differences do not constitute the
only cause of dissension in France。 They are held by men
possessing that particular mentality which I have already
described under the name of the revolutionary mentality。 We have
seen that each period always presents a certain number of
individuals ready to revolt against the established order of
things； whatever that may be； even though it may realise all
their desires。
The intolerance of the parties in France； and their desire to
seize upon power； are further favoured by the conviction； so
prevalent under the Revolution； that societies can be remade by
means of laws。 The modern State； whatever its leader； has
inherited in the eyes of the multitudes and their leaders the
mystic power attributed to the ancient kings； when these latter
were regarded as an incarnation of the Divine will。 Not only the
people is inspired by this confidence in the power of Government；
all our legislators entertain it also。＇11＇
＇11＇ After the publication of an article of mine concerning
legislative illusions； I received from one of our most eminent
politicians； M。 Boudenot the senator； a letter from which I
extract the following passage： ‘‘Twenty years passed in the
Chamber and the Senate have shown me how right you are。 How many
times I have heard my colleagues say： ‘The Government ought to
prevent this； order that；' &c。 What would you have？ there are
fourteen centuries of monarchical atavism in our blood。''
Legislating always； politicians never realise that as
institutions are effects； and not causes； they have no virtue in
themselves。 Heirs to the great revolutionary illusion； they do
not see that man is created by a past whose foundations we are
powerless to reshape。
The conflict between the principles dividing France； which has
lasted more than a century； will doubtless continue for a long
time yet； and no one can foresee what fresh upheavals it may
engender。 No doubt if before our era the Athenians could have
divined that their social dissensions would have led to the
enslavement of Greece； they would have renounced them； but how
could they have foreseen as much？ M。 Guiraud justly writes： ‘‘A
generation of men very rarely realises the task which it
is accomplishing。 It is preparing for the future； but this
future is often the contrary of what it wishes。''
2。 Summary of a Century's Revolutionary Movement in France。
The psychological causes of the revolutionary movements which
France has seen during the past century having been explained； it
will now suffice to present a summary picture of these successive
revolutions。
The sovereigns in coalition having defeated Napoleon； they
reduced France to her former limits； and placed Louis XVIII。； the
only possible sovereign； on the throne。
By a special charter the new king accepted the position of a
constitutional monarch under a representative system of
government。 He recognised all the conquests of the Revolution：
the civil Code； equality before the law； liberty of worship；
irrevocability of the sale of national property； &c。 The right
of suffrage； however； was limited to those paying a certain
amount in taxes。
This liberal Constitution was opposed by the ultra…royalists。
Returned emigres； they wanted the restitution of the national
property； and the re…establishment of their ancient privileges。
Fearing that such a reaction might cause a new revolution； Louis
XVIII。 was reduced to dissolving the Chamber。 The election
having returned moderate deputies； he was able to continue to
govern with the same principles； understanding very well that any
attempt to govern the French by the ancien regime would be
enough to provoke a general rebellion。
Unfortunately； his death； in 1824； placed Charles X。； formerly
Comte d'Artois； on the throne。 Extremely narrow； incapable of
understanding the new world which surrounded him； and boasting
that he had not modified his ideas since 1789； he prepared a
series of reactionary lawsa law by which an indemnity of forty
millions sterling was to be paid to emigres； a law of sacrilege；
and laws establishing the rights of primogeniture； the
preponderance of the clergy； &c。
The majority of the deputies showing themselves daily more
opposed to his projects； in 1830 he enacted Ordinances dissolving
the Chamber； suppressing the liberty of the Press； and preparing
for the restoration of the ancien regime。
The effect was immediate。 This autocratic action provoked a
coalition of the leaders of all parties。 Republicans；
Bonapartists； Liberals； Royalistsall united in order to raise
the Parisian populace。 Four days after the publication of the
Ordinances the insurgents were masters of the capital； and
Charles X。 fled to England。
The leaders of the movementThiers； Casimir…Perier； La Fayette；
&c。summoned to Paris Louis…Philippe； of whose existence the
people were scarcely aware； and declared him king of the French。
Between the indifference of the people and the hostility of the
nobles； who had remained faithful to the legitimate dynasty； the
new king relied chiefly upon the bourgeoisie。 An electoral law
having reduced the electors to less than 200；000； this class
played an exclusive part in the government。
The situation of the sovereign was not easy。 He had to struggle
simultaneously against the legitimist supporters of Henry
V。 the grandson of Charles X。； and the Bonapartists； who
recognised as their head Louis…Napoleon； the Emperor's nephew；
and finally against the republicans。
By means of their secret societies； analogous to the clubs of the
Revolution； the latter provoked numerous riots at various
intervals between 1830 and 1840； but these were easily repressed。
The clericals and legitimists； on their side； did not cease their
intrigues。 The Duchess de Berry； the mother of Henry V。； tried
in vain to raise the Vendee。 As to the clergy； their demands
finally made them so intolerable that an insurrection broke out；
in the course of which the palace of the archbishop of Paris was
sacked。
The republicans as a party were not very dangerous； as the
Chamber sided with the king in the struggle against them。 The
minister Guizot； who advocated a strong central power； declared
that two things were indispensable to government‘‘reason and
cannon。'' The famous statesman was surely somewhat deluded as to
the necessity or efficacy of reason。
Despite this strong central power； which in reality was